Work‐place bullying: A group processes framework
By S. Ramsay, Ashlea Troth, Sara Branch. 2011
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef383b2f1679c415fcad77b4b1be51ad4b131d00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Staale Einarsen
- M. B. Nielsen
- J. Escartín
- Dieter Zapf
- Rolf van Dick
- Johannes Ullrich
- E. Schlüter
- G. Notelaers
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- M. B. Nielsen
- J. Escartín
- Dieter Zapf
- Rolf van Dick
- Johannes Ullrich
- E. Schlüter
- G. Notelaers
Citations in the corpus
- What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: An overview of the literature and agenda for future research (2018, background): “Workplace bullying are essentially of a rule-breaking nature as it involve negative acts against others with less power to defend (Ramsay et al., 2011), and a social rule perspective could therefore be beneficial with regard to understanding how bullying arise, develops, and are handled in organizat”
- Individual‐ and group‐level effects of social identification on workplace bullying (2013, methodology): “It appears intriguing to integrate the theoretical assumptions offered in the present article with the propositions in Ramsay et al. (2011) and collect empirical measures of norm deviance to test the independent contributions of these effects in future studies.”
- Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, unknown): “…not visually represented on the model, although these are both briefly discussed in the explanation, perhaps reflecting the lack of attention that currently exists in the literature in relation to the group level of analysis (see Ramsay et al. 2011) and perpetrators (see Zapf and Einarsen 2011).”