An information technology trilogy: business strategy, technological deployment and organizational performance

By A. Croteau, François Bergeron. Journal of strategic information systems, 2001

516 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed9bbbe12d0a056da6c318d284f941366793cd55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Paul P. Tallon
2. Blaize Horner Reich
3. Yolande E. Chan
4. Daniel Q. Chen
5. Suzanne Rivard
6. David S. Preston

In Management Information Systems

1. Paul P. Tallon
2. David S. Preston
3. Daniel Q. Chen
4. Louis Raymond
5. Suzanne Rivard
6. Yolande E. Chan
7. Blaize Horner Reich
8. Martin Mocker

Citations in the corpus

• Mediating role of enterprise risk management practices between business strategy and SME performance (2019, background): “Mediating role of ERM between business strategy and firm performance A body of research has discussed the relationship between strategy and organizational performance (Croteau & Bergeron, 2001; Parnell, 2010; Shirokova & Shatalov, 2010; Snow & Hrebiniak, 1980).”
• A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy (2007, methodology): “Using the same typology, Croteau and Bergeron [19] find that IT facilitates or supports strategy in prospectors and analyzers but, curiously, has a degenerative effect on strategy in defenders.”
• The Impacts of Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Organizational Strategy on Firm Performance (2014, background): “Miles and Snow’s typology consists of four types of business strategy defined as prospector, defender, analyzer and reactor (Croteau and Bergeron, 2001: 78- 79).”
• Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: Implications for performance (2012, background): “PLS is a structural equation modeling tool that produces loadings and weights between items and constructs and estimates standardized regression coefficients (i.e.,β-coefficients) for paths between constructs (Croteau and Bergeron, 2001).”
• Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach (2017, unknown): “…is important because it has been found to be associated with performance (Bergeron, Raymond, & Rivard, 2004; Chan, Huff, Barclay, & Copeland, 1997; Croteau & Bergeron, 2001; Gerow et al., 2014; Kearns & Sabherwal, 2007; Oh & Pinsonneault, 2007; Sia, Soh, &Weill, 2016; Zahra & Covin, 1993).”
• IT alignment: what have we learned? (2007, background): “A minor adjustment suggested by Croteau and Bergeron (2001) is that future research consider a wider range of approaches to operationalize strategic activities (e.g., Porter, 1980; Wiseman, 1988), and better theoretically justify the specific approaches adopted (Bergeron et al ., 2001).”
• Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications (2010, background): “Specifically, many of the extant research studies of the intellectual stream of alignment (Chan and Reich 2007; Chan et al. 2006; Croteau and Bergeron 2001; Oh and Pinsonneault 2007; Sabherwal and Chan 2001) attempt to identify a certain IS strategy that must fit with a particular given business str”
• Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance (2006, background): “…to study the manner in which IT supports a business, both from an external and an internal perspective, and empirically link this support to business performance (Chan et al., 1997; Luftman et al., 1999; Papp, 1999; Croteau and Bergeron, 2001; Sabherwal and Chan, 2001; Croteau and Raymond, 2004).”