Blaize Horner Reich

Management Information Systems · 2000–2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Blaize Horner Reich trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Rajiv Sabherwal
  2. Yolande E. Chan
  3. Geneviève Bassellier
  4. Izak Benbasat
  5. David E. Avison
  6. Grover S. Kearns
  7. François Bergeron

Who trusts Blaize Horner Reich overall

  1. Yolande E. Chan
  2. Felix B. Tan
  3. Geneviève Bassellier
  4. Paul P. Tallon
  5. Ranjit Bose
  6. M. Gordon Hunter
  7. Grover S. Kearns
  8. Rajiv Sabherwal
  9. Anandhi S. Bharadwaj
  10. Izak Benbasat

Papers from Blaize Horner Reich's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Blaize Horner Reich trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model (Journal of Management Information Systems)
  2. Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives (MIS Q.)
  3. Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment
  4. A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage (Decision Sciences)
  5. Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain (Information Manager (The))
  6. IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms (Journal of strategic information systems)
  7. Book Review : Structural Equations with Latent Variables Kenneth A. Bollen New York: Wiley, 1989, 514 pp., approx. $44.95
  8. Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders (Information systems research)
  9. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice (Communications of the Association for Information Systems)
  10. The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

Their papers