Linking Service-Dominant Logic and Strategic Business Practice
By I. Karpen, L. Bove, B. Lukas. 2012
374 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea74928103f8eba93f762b1d46fb4a52bdaa6030
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Roderick Brodie
- Mark Glynn
- Marcel J. H. van Birgelen
- Kumar Rakesh Ranjan
- Marco Galvagno
- Carmen Neghina
- D. Dalli
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Roderick Brodie
- Mark Glynn
- Marcel J. H. van Birgelen
- Kumar Rakesh Ranjan
- Marco Galvagno
- D. Dalli
- Stuart Read
In Sociology and Political Science
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Roderick Brodie
- Mark Glynn
- Marcel J. H. van Birgelen
- Kumar Rakesh Ranjan
- Marco Galvagno
- D. Dalli
- Stuart Read
Citations in the corpus
- Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review (2014, background): “Some contributions have been detected in extant literature and could be fruitfully considered in a new effort to integrate co-creation and the management-oriented theory of value (Bowman and Ambrosini, 2000; Priem, 2007; Pitelis, 2009; Karpen et al., 2012).”
- Value co-creation: concept and measurement (2014, background): “Personalization Personalization refers to the uniqueness of the actual or perceived use process, the value being contingent on individual characteristics (Etgar 2008; Karpen et al. 2012; Lemke et al. 2011).”
- Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation (2014, background): “2010); thus fitting within the broader theoretical perspectives of consumer culture theory (Arnould and Thompson 2005), the service-dominant logic (Vargo and Lusch 2004, 2008; Karpen et al. 2012), and relationship marketing (Vivek et al.”
- Value cocreation in service interactions (2015, methodology): “At the firm level, this translates into the firm’s ‘‘ability to enable its customers and other value network partners shape the nature and content of exchange’’ (Karpen et al., 2012: 28).”