The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in‐service teachers

By H. Cheung. 2006

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea70e26307c8bce05189229a93ce8eddb771fa1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. U. Sharma
2. T. Loreman
3. C. Forlin
4. Sally Wai-Yan Wan
5. Timo Saloviita
6. H. Savolainen
7. C. Boyle
8. K. Polyzopoulou

In Social Psychology

1. C. Forlin
2. Sally Wai-Yan Wan
3. U. Sharma
4. T. Loreman

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices (2012, methodology): “Over the last two decades, more research has been conducted, particularly to find out if the Western constructs (such as teacher efficacy and the use of psychological measuring instruments) are appropriate to non-Western contexts (Cheung, 2006; Lin and Gorrell, 2001).”
• Differentiated instruction: Hong Kong prospective teachers’ teaching efficacy and beliefs (2016, methodology): “Based on Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001), Hui, Kennedy, and Cheung (2006) and Cheung (2006, 2008) used a short form of Chinese version of the 12 items of Teachers’ Efficacy Scale (C-TSE) that was used for examining pre- and in-service teachers’ self-efficacy in general.”