Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research (2009, background): “A potential solution to the issue of methodological validity would be to use methodological triangulation (Jack and Raturi 2006 ).”
Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment (2020, methodology): “Triangulation (Jogulu and Pansiri, 2011) achieved by using the technique of combining and comparing multiple data sources, analysis and processes, reinforces the credibility of findings (Jack and Raturi, 2006).”
Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective (2014, unknown): “…that the use of mixed methodology may positively impact on the validation of the research: triangulation should further develop “the ability of researchers to draw conclusions from their studies and might result in a more robust and generalisable set of findings” (Jack and Raturi, 2006, p. 316).”
What motivates users to hashtag on social media? (2019, background): “First, in light of the literature review and the responses in Study 1, we aimed to triangulate the knowledge obtained with additional data focused more on depth rather than breadth (Jack & Raturi, 2006; Patton, 1990).”