The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research

By Rainer Harms, Sascha Kraus, Erich J. Schwarz. 2009

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23f0b3ebff3cd346b96ec11786df66530b754cf4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
2. Miriam Schüssler
3. Sascha Kraus
4. Carl Henning Reschke
5. Ilkka Kauranen

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Miriam Schüssler
2. Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
3. Sascha Kraus
4. Ilkka Kauranen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano
2. Miriam Schüssler
3. Sascha Kraus
4. Ilkka Kauranen

Citations in the corpus

• Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method (2017, methodology): “Above all, it finally answers the question of how to empirically identify success paths proposed through the configuration approach theory (e.g., Mugler et al. 2003; Harms et al. 2009).”
• Hyper-Growth of SMEs: Toward a Reconciliation of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Strategic Resources (2012, unknown): “Coherently with contingent and configuration model (Harms et al., 2009), ShipCo has grown despite a low to moderate EO in a stable and munificent environment.”
• Identification of domains for a new conceptual model of strategic entrepreneurship using the configuration approach (2011, background): “This approach is powerful in analyzing relationships of several domains simultaneously and, thus, building new conceptual models consisting of more than one domain (Harms et al., 2009).”