Social appraisal: the social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes

By A. S. R. Manstead, Agneta H. Fischer. 2001

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e998ecc8635bb83a52255be40ce479b93360c3f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An Appraisal-Driven Componential Approach to the Emotional Brain (2018, unknown): “…is the idea that “Behaviors, thoughts, or feelings of one or more other persons in the emotional situation are appraised in addition to the appraisal of the event per se” (see Manstead & Fischer, 2001, p. 222), represents an important avenue for future research in social and affective neuroscience.”
The Social Life of Emotions: THE INTERPERSONAL CONTEXT (2004, unknown): “Sharing an emotion with others may also alter the experience itself (see Manstead & Fischer, 2001; Parkinson, 1995).”
Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI (2012, unknown): “In addition, emotional expressions inform observers about the expresser’s appraisal of the situation (Manstead & Fischer, 2001; Van Doorn, Heerdink, & Van Kleef, 2012).”
Interpersonal Affect Dynamics: It Takes Two (and Time) to Tango (2015, background): “It is not surprising, therefore, that when people are in each other’s presence, each person’s expressive behavior can modify the other person’s focus of attention (Manstead & Fischer, 2001).”
Where Have All the People Gone? A Plea for Including Social Interaction in Emotion Research (2010, methodology): “In earlier work we have referred to this process as “social appraisal” (Manstead & Fischer, 2001), “the appraisal of the thoughts, feelings, and actions of other persons in response to an emotional situation” (p. 223).”
The Social Costs and Benefits of Anger as a Function of Gender and Relationship Context (2011, background): “We have referred to such expectations as negative social appraisals (Evers et al. 2005; Manstead and Fischer 2001).”
Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it (2014, background): “In addition, emotional expressions inform perceivers about the expresser’s appraisal of the situation (Manstead and Fischer, 2001).”
Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. (2007, background): “These appraisals depend, among other things, on the history of one’s relationship with the other person or on the specific social context (see also Manstead & Fischer, 2001; Parkinson, 2001; Parkinson, Fischer, & Manstead, 2005), in addition to the ethical domain to which the behavior belongs.”
The Emerging View of Emotion as Social Information (2010, unknown): “In addition, emotional expressions inform observers about the expresser's appraisal of the situation (Manstead & Fischer, 2001).”
Social influences on the emotion process (2003, background): “…have also been advanced by psychologists and philosophers, (e.g., Averill, 1980; Baumeister, Stillwell, & Heatherton, 1994; Fridlund, 1994; Harré, 1986; Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994; Manstead & Fischer, 2001; Parkinson, 1998, 2001; Parrott, 2001; Shields, 2002; Mackie, Devos, & Smith, 2000).”
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion (2005, unknown): “…van Reekum & Scherer, 1997), transitory motivational states or moods (Forgas, 1991), and cultural values, group pressures, and the like can strongly inﬂuence the appraisal outcomes (see Manstead & Fischer, 2001; Mesquita & Ellsworth, 2001; Mesquita, Frijda, & Scherer, 1997; Scherer, 1997a, 1997b).”
Current Emotion Research in Social Psychology: Thinking About Emotions and Other People (2015, background): “Manstead and Fischer (2001) formalized the concept of social appraisal to cover situations in which relational meanings depend on other people’s perceived evaluations.”
Why We Hate (2018, background): “Knowing that other ingroup members experience an event in a similar way further reinforces the experience and expression of one’s own emotions (see also Manstead & Fischer, 2001).”
Emotional mimicry: why and when we mimic emotions (2014, background): “At the micro-level, emotional mimicry may help to establish such emotional convergence, for example, through social appraisals (Manstead & Fischer, 2001).”
Towards a Theory of Collective Emotions (2013, background): “…relevant appraisal-input comes from other actors (Oatley, 2000); as (b) socially learned by adopting appraisals of various socialization agents (Manstead & Fischer, 2001); or as (c) a process of legitimizing and supporting one’s appraisals by reference to the appraisals of others (Manstead &…”
The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review (2008, background): “We propose that CMC is especially likely to reduce negative social appraisals (Manstead & Fischer, 2001) both with regard to negative and positive emotion expressions.”
Emotion is for influence (2011, background): “In addition, emotional expressions inform observers about the expresser’s appraisal of the situation (Manstead & Fischer, 2001).”