A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion
By David Sander, Didier Grandjean, Klaus R. Scherer. Neural Networks, 2005
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87e245993bcab497214a6cb7e0b1d5e381436976
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Denny Borsboom
- Lourens J. Waldorp
- A. Cramer
- Sacha Epskamp
- Eiko I. Fried
- Thierry Pun
- James L. Szalma
- Didier Grandjean
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Denny Borsboom
- A. Cramer
- Sacha Epskamp
- Lourens J. Waldorp
- Eiko I. Fried
- Thierry Pun
- Mohammad Soleymani
- Richard J. McNally
In Social Psychology
- Didier Grandjean
- James L. Szalma
- Mohammad Soleymani
- Klaus R. Scherer
- Thierry Pun
- Sameer Hosany
- Reinhard Kopiez
- Oliver Grewe
Citations in the corpus
- Isn't It Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs (2011, neutral): “Further, evolutionarily determined affect might be directly triggered by a product’s physical design features when a consumer sees a product; hence, responses to product design”
- RETHINKING THE EMOTIONAL BRAIN (2012, neutral): “…conscious, determines stimulus meaning and predisposes actions (e.g., Arnold, 1960; Bowlby, 1969; Frijda, 1986; Lazarus, 1991a, 1991b; Leventhal and Scherer, 1987; Lazarus and Folkman, 1984; Smith and Ellsworth, 1985; Scherer, 1988; Scherer et al., 2001; Sander et al., 2005; Jarymowicz, 2009).”
- Chills in different sensory domains: Frisson elicited by acoustical, visual, tactile and gustatory stimuli (2011, methodology): “…they result from a combination of a physiological arousal and subjective feeling response; they are related to distinct musical structures (external events); and, in contrast to moods, they are 222 Psychology of Music 39(2) of a short duration (Merten, 2003; Sander et al., 2005; Scherer, 2005).”
- Emotion Assessment From Physiological Signals for Adaptation of Game Difficulty (2011, background): “There is an increasing amount of psychological literature pointing toward the hypothesis that emotions result from a series of cognitive processes [10], [11].”
- Short-term emotion assessment in a recall paradigm (2009, background): “According to the cognitive theory of emotions, emotions are issued from a cognitive process called appraisal that evaluates a stimulus according to several criteria such as goal relevance and consequences of the event (Cornelius, 1996; Sander et al., 2005; Scherer, 2001).”
- Toward a Mental Systems Approach to Human Relationships with Wildlife: The Role of Emotional Dispositions (2012, background): “Scholars of emotional appraisal list general criteria (labeled “appraisal dimensions,” “appraisal criteria,” “stimulus evaluation checks,” or simply “appraisals”) that are employed to evaluate the emotional relevance of situations and to guide the unfolding emotional response ( Ellsworth & Scherer, ”
- Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture (2009, background): “They were actively developed in the early 1980s (see the historical reviews by Scherer 1999, 2001) by Ellsworth and Scherer and their students (Scherer 1984, 2001; Smith & Ellsworth 1985; Roseman & Smith 2001; Sander et al. 2005).”
- The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, neutral): “If appraisals, describe processes that cause emotions (i.e., are causal mechanisms) (see Grandjean & Scherer 2008; Sander et al. 2005; Scherer 2009a), however, then it is necessary to empirically evaluate which psychological descriptions are most effective – our ingredients or Scherer’s appraisals.”
- EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics (2009, background): “For example, Sander et al. (Sander, Grandjean, & Scherer, 2005) propose an abstract neural network model that characterizes general information processing constraints but does not allow one to represent specific emotional situations.”
- Emotion and attention interactions in social cognition: Brain regions involved in processing anger prosody (2005, neutral): “NeuroImage 28 (2005) 848 – 858 and critical evaluation process is responsible for detecting the extent to which stimulus events (e.g., anger prosody in voices during social interaction) are relevant for the momentary hierarchy of goals and needs of the individual, possibly leading to an enhancement ”