Emotion is for influence

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information (2018, background): “www.Ebook777.com Despite this potential for mutual influence, there are good reasons for distinguishing between affective reactions and inferential processes (Van Kleef et al., 2011).”
Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI (2012, unknown): “Emotions as Social Information (EASI) theory (Van Kleef, 2009; see also, Van Kleef, De Dreu, & Manstead, 2010; Van Kleef et al., 2011) is rooted in the aforementioned socialfunctional approach to emotion.”
Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it (2014, background): “Although affective reactions and inferential processes can influence each other, they can be distinguished both conceptually and empirically (for an elaborate discussion, see Van Kleef et al., 2011).”
The Enhancing Versus Backfiring Effects of Positive Emotion in Consumer Reviews (2020, background): “Surprise toward a review has the potential to provoke negative reactions from readers (Van Kleef et al. 2011).”
Beyond negotiated outcomes: The hidden costs of anger expression in dyadic negotiation (2012, background): “The affective mechanism of the EASI model (Van Kleef, 2009; Van Kleef et al., 2011) predicts that opponents’ expressions of anger influence focal negotiators’ affective states.”