Am I Respected or Not?: Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership
By David de Cremer, Tom Tyler. 2005
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8e9b7491fb2bf3f756d716e07e54cb2e6d784e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Jordan H. Stein
- David M. Mayer
- David de Cremer
- Tom Tyler
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Niels Van Quaquebeke
In Sociology and Political Science
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Tom Tyler
- B. Bradford
- David de Cremer
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Jordan H. Stein
- J. Jackson
- Blake E. Ashforth
Citations in the corpus
- The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services (2008, background): “One way in which researchers have accounted for respect in a collective context is by defining the phenomenon as regard by one's social group, often communicated in the form of status within the group (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005 ; Smith & Tyler, 1997 ; Tyler, 1999 ; Tyler & Blader, 2001 ).”
- Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change ☆ (2005, background): “Indeed, prior research has convincingly shown that fair procedures significantly affect employees’ identity and self (see De Cremer & Tyler, 2005b, for an overview).”
- Obeying the Rules of the Road (2015, background): “…that police procedural justice will be differentially salient to people depending on the extent of their identification with the group police represent; the strength of identification will affect the degree to which, for example, procedural justice predicts legitimacy (de Cremer & Tyler, 2005).”
- Respect in Organizations: Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me” (2017, methodology): “Similarly, De Cremer and Tyler (2005) implicitly draw on particularized respect in their theorizing, and the respect manipulations in their experiments involved particularized respect or were unclear about the form of respect.”
- Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. (2006, methodology): “Based on the work of De Cremer and his colleagues (e.g., De Cremer, 2002; De Cremer & Alberts, 2004; De Cremer & Leonardelli, 2003, De Cremer & Tyler, 2005) we argue that individuals also seek to maintain a sense of belonging to important groups.”
- Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects (2009, methodology): “Better known among organizational scientists is Folger’s (1998; 2001) work on deontic justice. The theory argues that people also act out of principled moral obligations. Fairness involves what people should receive or how they deserve to be treated (Folger & Salvador, 2008). Based on these ideas, F”
- Unraveling respect in organization studies (2014, background): “In contrast, appraisal respect should be more closely related to work effort because it is closer to more accessible explicit self-esteem (De Cremer and Tyler, 2005; Sleebos et al., 2006; Tyler and Blader, 2002).”
- Feeling Included and Valued: How Perceived Respect Affects Positive Team Identity and Willingness to Invest in the Team (2013, unknown): “When someone is respected by other team members, this conveys that the individual is valued by them (Ellemers, de Gilder and Haslam, 2004) and is included as a full member of the team (De Cremer and Tyler, 2005; Leary et al., 2003).”
- Received Respect and Constructive Voice: The Roles of Proactive Motivation and Perspective Taking (2019, methodology): “Received respect signals to employees that their personal qualities are accepted and appreciated by other employees, fulfilling their need to belong (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005; Huo et al., 2010).”
- When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models (2012, methodology): “Our findings are, first of all, relevant for relational models like the group engagement model (Tyler & Blader, 2003) and the selfbased model of cooperation (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005a) that were developed to explain the relationship between procedural fairness and employee OCB.”
- How the Grapevine Keeps You in Line (2011, background): “The impression that one makes in a certain social interaction can be communicated through gossip, thus possibly leading to exclusion from groups and reputation damage (see De Cremer & Sedikides, 2008; De Cremer & Tyler, 2005a, 2005b; Hardy & Van Vugt, 2006; Van Vugt & Hardy, 2010).”