A comparison of validation criteria: Objective versus subjective performance measures and self- versus supervisor ratings.

By C. C. Hoffman, Barry R. Nathan, Lisa M. Holden. 2006

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Pharmacology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e782e84046fa47048003c3a2ad499a1b363b798e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. N. V. van Loon
2. P. Leisink
3. W. Vandenabeele
4. Beatrice van der Heijden
5. C. V. D. Heijde
6. M. Inuwa
7. Sangmook Kim
8. D. Giauque

In Pharmacology

1. P. Leisink
2. W. Vandenabeele
3. N. V. van Loon

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. P. Leisink
2. W. Vandenabeele
3. N. V. van Loon

Citations in the corpus

• A competence‐based and multidimensional operationalization and measurement of employability (2006, background): “Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm ings by others (Hoffman et al., 1991; Holzbach, 1978; Thornton, 1980).”
• Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit (2017, methodology): “…and that management practices show similar effects using both subjective and register performance data, but others view objective data as “the golden standard” (Andrews, Boyne, & Walker, 2011; Bommer, Johnson, Rich, Podsakoff, & Mackenzie, 1995; C. C. Hoffman et al., 1991; Meier & O’Toole, 2013).”