Situational Judgment: Antecedents and Relationships with Performance

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. (2007, background): “…performance is through the accumulation of job knowledge— intelligent employees are better able to acquire the knowledge required to perform a job successfully (Weekley & Ployhart, 2005), and experience provides needed opportunities for knowledge acquisition (Schmidt, Hunter, & Outerbridge, 1986).”
SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS, RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS, AND VALIDITY: A META‐ANALYSIS (2007, background): “However, several studies have reported incremental validity of a SJT over a battery containing cognitive ability and personality (Chan & Schmitt, 2002; Clevenger et al., 2001; O’Connell, Hartman, McDaniel, Grubb, & Lawrence, in press; Weekley & Ployhart 2005).”
Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research (2009, methodology): “For example, Sternberg et al. (2000) argued that SJTs, which he had called practical intelligence tests, measured a single construct distinct from general cognitive ability.”
A SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST OF PERSONAL INITIATIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE (2009, background): “Many authors are calling for a shift of focus towards the processes and constructs underlying situational judgments for the better understanding and improved application of SJTs (e.g. Weekley & Ployhart, 2005).”