A Shortened Stress Evaluation Tool (ASSET)

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Performance (2013, methodology): “UWES-9 was used to measure work engagement; job performance was characterized by task performance and contextual performance as assessed by the Goodman and Svyantek (1999) scale.”
The experience of work‐related stress across occupations (2005, methodology): “(Faragher et al., 2004) and as such is reported here as a useful indication of”
Work environments, stress and productivity: An examination using ASSET (2005, background): “These sections divide into various subscales that have been empirically validated in previous research (Faragher et al., 2004).”
Causes of stress before, during and after organizational change: a qualitative study (2015, background): “Prior research into organizational stress has demonstrated the relevance of poor management and inadequate communication (Faragher et al., 2004; Riolli and Savicki, 2006), and in the current study these were severe sources for some respondents but much milder for others.”
Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organisational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors (2013, background): “The fourth purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and predictability of the organizational stress subscales of ASSET (Cartwright and Cooper, 2002; Johnson and Cooper, 2003; Faragher et al., 2004) within an Indian work context.”