Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self‐construal activation

By U. Kühnen, B. Hannover. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2c2d36ad729d3eb2b9f366b6957218811a18371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. D. Oyserman
2. Norbert Schwarz
3. E. Hardin
4. Chia-huei Wu
5. Berna Gerçek-Swing
6. Long-Zeng Wu
7. Cynthia Lee
8. Susan E. Cross

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Norbert Schwarz
2. D. Oyserman
3. E. Hardin
4. Berna Gerçek-Swing
5. Susan E. Cross
6. Sharon K. Parker
7. Long-Zeng Wu
8. Chia-huei Wu

Citations in the corpus

• When and Why People Engage in Different Forms of Proactive Behavior: Interactive Effects of Self-construals and Work Characteristics (2017, methodology): “…assigned to participants in the self-construal conditions, using provided words, from a scrambled sentence task for self-construal priming (e.g., Kühnen & Hannover, 2000; Utz, 2004) that asks participants to create grammatically correct sentences repeatedly, using different sets of words (see…”
• The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal (2011, methodology): “studies and in similar research by Kurman (2001), the better-than-average method, has been criticized on multiple grounds (Heine & Hamamura, 2007).”
• Is the Interdependent Self More Sensitive to Question Context Than the Independent Self? Self-Construal and the Observation of Conversational Norms☆ (2002, methodology): “…accessibility of independent or interdependent components of their self-concepts, we used a priming procedure developed by Gardner and colleagues (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Gardner, Gabriel, & Lee, 1999; for an alternative procedure, see Kühnen & Hannover, 2000; Trafimow, Triandis, & Goto, 1991).”
• Assessing the Validity of Self Construal Scales: A Response to Levine et al. (2003, result): “Several other studies have produced compatible results (e.g., Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Kühnen & Hannover, 2000; Lee, Aaker, & Gardner, 2000; Stapel & Koomen, 2001; Trafimow, Silverman, Fan, & Law, 1997; Trafimow, Triandis, & Goto, 1991).”
• Social Identity and Self-Regulation (2007, unknown): “The pattern of assimilation with “we” priming is also shown in studies with German participants using the pronoun-circling task (Kuhnen & Haberstroh, 2004) and by writing down independence (interdependence)-relevant words in scrambled sentences (Kuhnen & Hannover, 2000).”