Assessing the Validity of Self Construal Scales: A Response to Levine et al.
By William B. Gudykunst, Carmen M Lee. 2003
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db56637ce7deefa3f3e7f667af041690915ad777
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- David C. DeAndrea
- E. Hardin
- Timothy R. Levine
- Alastair Henry
- C. Cliffordson
- Berna Gerçek-Swing
- A. Church
- D. Daukantaitė
Citations in the corpus
- Implicit Theories and Self-Perceptions of Traitedness Across Cultures (2006, background): “…my self interest for the benefit of the group I am in.” Although controversy has emerged about the validity of self-construal scales (e.g., Kim & Raja, 2003; Levine et al., 2003), many cross-cultural studies have reported findings consistent with self-construal theory (Gudykunst & Lee, 2003).”
- Online Language: The Role of Culture in Self-Expression and Self-Construal on Facebook (2010, background): “According to Gudykunst and Lee (2003), individuals socialized in collectivistic cultures are influenced to conceive of themselves in a particular interdependent fashion. More germane to the specific discussion of interdependent self-construals, the aforementioned results were reproduced in the meta-”
- Motivation, Gender, and Possible Selves (2013, background): “While the results of the CFA modeling for the conglomeration of the three L3 languages (French, German, and Spanish) were confirmed by separate modeling procedures for German and for Spanish, unfortunately, due to the low numbers of students in relation to the included parameters, it was not possibl”
- The Harmony in Life Scale Complements the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Expanding the Conceptualization of the Cognitive Component of Subjective Well-Being (2016, background): “The Self-Construal Scales short version (Gudykunst and Lee 2003) assesses the independent and interdependent self (as conceptualized by Markus and Kitayama 1991).”
- The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal (2011, background): “…however, have argued that although we would expect a high InterSC individual’s sense of self and concomitant cognitions, emotions, or behaviors to vary based on the situation, we would not expect his or her fundamental level of InterSC to be variable (Gudykunst & Lee, 2003; M.-S. Kim & Raja, 2003).”