The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal

By Susan E. Cross, E. Hardin, Berna Gerçek-Swing. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2011

786 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5aaeebd26aaa12454deb9951d69e3fe12f65c5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Long-Zeng Wu
2. R. Cheng
3. Sharon K. Parker
4. Wendy Wood
5. Shui‐fong Lam
6. Chia-huei Wu
7. A. Eagly
8. Cynthia Lee

In Social Psychology

1. Wendy Wood
2. A. Eagly
3. Chia-huei Wu
4. Long-Zeng Wu
5. Cynthia Lee
6. K. Ramos
7. S. Nartova-Bochaver
8. O. Robinson

Citations in the corpus

• The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation (2013, positive): “As suggested by Cross, Hardin, and Gercek-Swing (2011), self-construal describes individuals more than cultures.”
• Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior (2015, background): “However, as Cross et al. (2011) point out, this influence is likely to be due to perceived support from valued others.”
• Living in a Global World: Influence of Consumer Global Orientation on Attitudes toward Global Brands from Developed versus Emerging Countries (2013, background): “Furthermore, combining the measured chronic self-construal and primed accessible self-construal in investigating these relationships may lead to more robust results because these two approaches of selfconstrual activation are independent and additive in nature (Cross, Hardin, and Gercek-Swing 2011).”
• When and Why People Engage in Different Forms of Proactive Behavior: Interactive Effects of Self-construals and Work Characteristics (2017, background): “…used to examine individual differences in independent and interdependent self-construals, came from a culture (China) that strongly promotes interdependent self-construal (see Cross et al., 2011, for a review), raising the question of potential range restriction on independent self-construal.”
• Two Traditions of Research on Gender Identity (2015, background): “This aspect of the gendered self was explored initially by Cross and Madson (1997; see also Baumeister and Sommer 1997) and elaborated in more recent work (Cross et al. 2011; Gardner and Gabriel 2004).”
• Authenticity, Social Context, and Well-Being in the United States, England, and Russia (2013, background): “…“individualism vs. collectivism” dimension is of central importance to the issue of authenticity; individualistic cultures promote independent self-construal (Cross et al., 2011), whereas collectivist cultures promote unquestioned loyalty to a group and corresponding interdependent self-construal.”