Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate Laboratory.
By Laura Buck, Stacey Lowery Bretz, M. Towns. 2008
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e24a3028f7c279e3b8c4ab609970753bd7089991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Evrim Ural
- Susan Rundell Singer
- H. Schweingruber
- Natalie R. Nielsen
- S. Srikoon
- Penporn Vangpoomyai
- Jareunkwan Rattanavongsa
- Ganya Rachahoon
Citations in the corpus
- Enhanced Learning of Biotechnology Students by an Inquiry-Based Cellulase Laboratory. (2010, background): “Not so many inquiry based laboratories have been implemented at the college level, as reported by Buck et al. (2008) on the evolution of levels of inquiry (levels 0,1/2,1,2,3) in laboratory texts across science disciplines.”
- Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry (2014, methodology): “Our manipulation follows closely the schema proposed by Buck et al. (2008).”
- The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students' Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement (2016, background): “In some studies, it is stated that educators are faced with many difficulties while doing inquiry activities (Buck, Bretz, and Towns, 2008).”
- Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. (2012, result): “This research has been extended to other disciplines with similar results (Whitson et al., 2008).”