Ease-of-Retrieval as an Automatic Input in Judgments: A Mere-Accessibility Framework?

By Geeta Menon, Priya Raghubir. 2003

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0157edde1c423c36437e634874811d8788f9a99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Cait Poynor
2. A. Samson
3. Norbert Schwarz
4. Robert B. Cialdini
5. Petia K. Petrova
6. Vicki G. Morwitz
7. P. Herr
8. Kristin Diehl

In General Decision Sciences

1. Petia K. Petrova
2. Robert B. Cialdini
3. Frank Kardes
4. Manoj. T. Thomas
5. Vicki G. Morwitz
6. Kristin Diehl
7. Cait Poynor
8. A. Samson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Petia K. Petrova
2. Robert B. Cialdini
3. Norbert Schwarz
4. Frank Kardes
5. Vicki G. Morwitz
6. Manoj. T. Thomas
7. A. Samson
8. P. Herr

Citations in the corpus

• Handbook of Consumer Psychology (2018, methodology): “Th is study was replicated by Menon and Raghubir (2003) using the accessibility/ease of retrieval framework (see also Huber, 2004).”
• Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations, and Satisfaction (2010, background): “Judgments of product satisfaction may be influenced not only by the preference match afforded by the actual product (declarative information) but also by feelings that accompany the process of identifying the best preference match (metacognitive information; see Menon and Raghubir 2003).”
• The Ease-of-Computation Effect: The Interplay of Metacognitive Experiences and Naive Theories in Judgments of Price Differences (2009, background): “…et al. 1991), health risk (Raghubir and Menon 1998), and truth (e.g., McGlone and Tofighbakhsh 2000; Reber and Schwarz 1999); evaluations of products (Lee and Labroo 2004; Menon and Raghubir 2003; Wanke, Bohner, and Jurowitsch 1997); and preference for brand logos (Janiszewski and Meyvis 2001).”
• Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making (2004, background): “For example, consumers have been found to like a product less, the more positive attributes they brought to mind (e.g., Menon & Raghubir, 2003; Wänke, Bohner, & Jurowitsch, 1997) and to be more likely to defer choice the more reasons they generated for making a choice (e.g., Novemsky, Dhar,…”
• Evoking the Imagination as a Strategy of Influence (2008, background): “Furthermore, consumers oft en base their product preferences not on the number of arguments for purchasing the product that they can generate, but rather on the subjective accessibility of these arguments (Menon & Raghubir, 2003; Wänke, Bohner, & Jurkowitsch, 1997).”