Moral Intensity and Managerial Problem Solving

By J. Dukerich, Mary J. Waller, Elizabeth George, George P. Huber. 2007

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df165bf4b0c2b862d5bf414e8d44cfe998911fba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Neglected Ethical and Spiritual Motivations in the Workplace (2015, background): “As we mentioned above, there is a growing body of literature suggesting that there is a spiritual reality as well as a moral one to people’s lives, and that this reality affects individuals in a variety of ways (Argandoña 2011; Dukerich et al. 2000; Fagley and Adler 2012; Karakas 2010; King 2006; Li”
The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making (2002, background): “nition in the second scenario is consistent with work by Dukerich et al. (2000) and Singhapakdi et al. (1996). These researchers found such relations using similar measures of moral recognition with different ethical scenarios.”
Investigating the Effects of Moral Disengagement and Participation on Unethical Work Behavior (2011, background): “While a number of studies have found that issue characteristics, such as amount of harm and extent of social consensus, do indeed influence moral recognition (e.g., Dukerich et al. 2000; Singhapakdi et al. 1996), the model does not account for the ability of individuals to psychologically reconstr”
13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going (2008, background): “Singhapakdi, Vitell, and Kraft ( 1996 ), for example, found that all six components were related to the recognition of an ethical problem among marketing researchers, whereas Dukerich, Waller, George, and Huber ( 2000 ) found a relationship with four of five dimensions of moral intensity (ie, the ma”