A mind of her own: The Evolutionary Psychology Of Women

By Andrea Campbell. 2002

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddf3173ada4c6397db0314b57c585de271c47e71

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. Michele J. Gelfand
2. M. van Vugt

In Education

1. Evangelia Demerouti
2. Arnold B. Bakker
3. Francis J. Flynn
4. Jason D. Shaw
5. Susan J. Ashford
6. Peter G. Klein
7. Nancy P. Rothbard
8. Hakan Ozcelik

In Social Psychology

1. Arnold B. Bakker
2. Evangelia Demerouti
3. Sharon K. Parker
4. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
5. C. Rudolph
6. M. Tims
7. Nancy P. Rothbard
8. Frederick Anseel

Citations in the corpus

• Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis. (2011, unknown): “The attraction of risky activities to men, however, need not depend upon heightened male sensitivity to reward but can be explained in terms of their lower punishment sensitivity as follows (Campbell, 2002).”
• Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions (2012, unknown): “As children, girls are more likely to select activities where there is no winner while boys select competitive games [5].”
• Gender Differences in Seeking Challenges: The Role of Institutions (2008, unknown): “Such gender differences may also influence the decision to enter challenging environments (Daly and Wilson 1983 and Campbell 2002).”
• Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? (2006, unknown): “Campbell (1999, 2002) suggested the latter in a complementary view which focuses on female disincentives for aggression.”
• Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking (2004, unknown): “Our results are not explicable in terms of Campbell s (2002) hypothesis that the sex difference in risk taking in response to anger-eliciting situations is due to greater concomitant fear in women, as men and women in the anger condition did not differ in level of self-reported fear (and, in additio”
• Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions (2008, unknown): “Indeed one of the reasons proposed to explain coalition formation between females is the protection from male aggression (Campbell, 2002).”
• Evolution and ontogeny of stress response to social challenges in the human child (2006, unknown): “Females also have complex alliances, but usually are not involved directly in the overt physical aggression characteristic of inter-group relations (Campbell, 2002; Geary & Flinn, 2002 ).”
• Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. (2005, unknown): “Females have complex alliances as well, but usually are not involved directly in the overt physical aggression characteristic of intergroup relations (Campbell, 2002; Geary & Flinn, 2002).”
• The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock: Does Evolutionary Psychology Exaggerate Human Sex Differences? (2013, unknown): “Rather than females exercising mate choice and males competing for females, both sexes have speciestypical mate preferences (Buss, 1989), and both sexes compete for desirable members of the other sex (Buss, 1988; Campbell, 2002).”
• Sex differences in sports interest and motivation: An evolutionary perspective. (2015, unknown): “Physical strength, and the assertiveness likely associated with it, would be advantageous in many contexts, including in protecting and provisioning offspring and kin (Campbell, 2002; Cashdan, 2008).”
• The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength (2014, unknown): “For this reason and others, aggression will be a more important tool of social negotiation for men than women (Archer, 2004; Campbell, 2002; Daly & Wilson, 1988; Wrangham & Peterson, 1996), and both men and women should be (and are) better calibrated to assess male strength (Sell, 2012).”
• Gender Differences in Competition (2008, unknown): “While a man’s death does not diminish his current reproductive success, a woman’s death may cause the loss of her current offspring (Campbell 2002), increasing the cost associated with competitive behavior.”
• Gender and Competition (2011, unknown): “The literature in evolutionary psychology and educational psychology suggests that boys and girls differ in their preferences for competitive games (Campbell 2002).”
• The recalibrational theory and violent anger (2011, unknown): “cooperative bargaining (Campbell, 2002).”