The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock: Does Evolutionary Psychology Exaggerate Human Sex Differences?

By Steve Stewart-Williams, Andrew G. Thomas. 2013

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e01adc7e5794493a4680250f810efdf053393af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Lawford-Smith
2. Victor Sojo
3. C. Fine

In Social Psychology

1. H. Lawford-Smith
2. Victor Sojo
3. C. Fine
4. Michael J. Hove
5. Jan Stupacher

In Sociology and Political Science

1. H. Lawford-Smith
2. Victor Sojo
3. C. Fine

Citations in the corpus

• Did sexual selection shape human music? Testing predictions from the sexual selection hypothesis of music evolution using a large genetically informative sample of over 10,000 twins (2015, background): “First, given the importance of mutual mate choice (Stewart-Williams & Thomas, 2013), pair-bonding, and bi-parental investment in humans, it could be that more musically skilled individuals attract higher quality sex partners (rather than greater quantity; Miller, 2013; Stewart-Williams& Thomas,…”
• Why Does Workplace Gender Diversity Matter? Justice, Organizational Benefits, and Policy (2019, background): “The appropriateness of this multivariate measurement of difference, as well as its conceptual meaning, remains a matter of debate (e.g., del Giudice, 2019; Hyde, 2014; Stewart-Williams & Thomas, 2013; see also contradictory findings by Carothers & Reis, 2012).”