The recalibrational theory and violent anger

By Aaron Sell. 2011

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84d24e054a79ee428f13b5e61c313b51bc804617

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kibeom Lee
2. Reinout E. de Vries
3. M. Ashton
4. J. Tooby
5. L. Cosmides
6. Benjamin E. Hilbig
7. Isabel Thielmann
8. Ingo Zettler

In Safety Research

1. Reinout E. de Vries
2. M. Ashton
3. Kibeom Lee
4. J. Tooby
5. L. Cosmides
6. C. A. Aktipis

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Tooby
2. L. Cosmides
3. Reinout E. de Vries
4. Kibeom Lee
5. M. Ashton
6. Aaron Sell
7. Benjamin E. Hilbig
8. Ingo Zettler

Citations in the corpus

• The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength (2014, background): “, 2009; Lukaszewski, 2013), the triggers that escalate angerbased aggression (Sell, 2011b), the content of anger-based arguments (Tooby et al.”
• The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors (2014, background): “A recent evolutionary interpretation of anger (Sell, 2011), which was apparently developed independently of our interpretation of low A, considers anger as a response to cues that an individual “does not weight the angry individual’s welfare highly when making decisions that impact them both” (p. 38”