Evaluating University Teaching: Time to take stock

By Alenoush Saroyan, Cheryl Amundsen. 2001

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddbfa0edab51d2fca9e0e5660e023ab79f34ad7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

From performativity to professionalism: lecturers’ responses to student feedback (2009, background): “On the other hand, student evaluations also represent an important part of universities’ performance management and quality assurance systems, as a means of judging whether lecturers are performing to a required standard (Chen and Hoshower 2003 ; Saroyan and Amundsen 2001 ).”
Perceived Impact of Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education (2007, background): “Saroyan and Amundsen (2001) have described teaching “as a complex, cognitive ability that is not innate but can be both learned and improved upon” (p.”
Student Evaluation Of College Teaching: A Practice In Search Of Principles (2004, background): “…rating scale (Adams 1997; Blunt 1991; d’Apollonia and Abrami 1997; Doyle 1983; Doyle and Whitely 1974; Ediger 1998; Haskell 1997a, 1997b, 1997c, 1997d; Remmers 1927; Rice and Stewart 2000; Rifkin 1995; Saroyan and Amundsen 2001; Sproule 2000; Starry, Derry, and Wright 1973; Wachtel 1998).”
Teaching for Global Literacy in Higher Education: How Prepared Are the Educators? (2007, methodology): “The workshop is based on the work of Saroyan and Amundsen (2001, 2004) and McAlpine and colleagues (e.g., McAlpine & Harris, 2002; McAlpine & Winer, 2002) whose research focuses on understanding the process of teaching development among university faculty members and the impact of various factors…”
Comparing the Effectiveness of Intensive and Traditional Courses (2010, background): “…2001)—with numerous studies supporting their validity, reliability, and accuracy (e.g., Cohen 1990; Feldman 1989; Greenwald 1997; Marsh 1987; Saroyan & Amundsen 2001)—some review studies do indicate that class size, workload, and grading leniency variables could have a minor effect on…”
Assessing the Teaching Quality of Accounting Programmes: An evaluation of the Course Experience Questionnaire (2003, background): “As teaching is a highly complex cognitive activity, multiple sources of data are required to provide a comprehensive evaluation (McKenzie et al., 1998; Saroyan & Amundsen, 2001).”