Perceived Impact of Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education

By Roisin Donnelly. 2007

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/819a9dece0f2469dfad5a6953ea93657236f079d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Inge Hill
2. D. Parsons
3. Graham Hendry
4. Jane Holland
5. Sony Jalarajan Raj
6. D. Willis
7. Mathew Abraham
8. Susan Thomas

Citations in the corpus

• A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education (2014, background): “As a result, faculty members may become defensive and adverse to change (Cosh, 1998; Donnelly, 2007).”
• Seeing is Believing: The Benefits of Peer Observation (2012, methodology): “Donnelly (2007) explored staff perceptions of a reciprocal peer observation "scheme", part of a postgraduate certificate program in teaching and learning in higher education.”
• Impact of Teaching Development Programmes in Higher Education. HEA Research Series. (2012, background): “Researchers have suggested that there is no generic definition of good teaching that suits all contexts and student cohorts (Donnelly, 2007).”