Does Diversity-Valuing Behavior Result in Diminished Performance Ratings for Non-White and Female Leaders?

By David R. Hekman, Stefanie K Johnson, Maw-Der Foo, Wei Yang. 2017

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dabd6cb57092fd563f13c59d4c0b740d68dccb74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Katherine J. Reynolds
2. Michelle K. Ryan
3. N. Branscombe
4. M. Verkuyten
5. N. Ellemers

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Katherine J. Reynolds
2. Michelle K. Ryan
3. N. Branscombe

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Katherine J. Reynolds
2. Michelle K. Ryan
3. N. Branscombe
4. Emina Subašić
5. M. Verkuyten
6. N. Ellemers
7. Michael J. A. Wohl
8. Michael T. Schmitt

Citations in the corpus

• “We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality (2018, background): “As a result, when men and women confront gender-based discrimination, they are judged differently by observers, with female leaders facing far greater “punishment” and backlash for parting with traditional gender norms (Hekman et al., 2017; Rudman, MossRacusin, Phelan, & Nauts, 2012).”