Michael J. A. Wohl

Sociology and Political Science · 2002–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 126 citations into it; #22,138 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,774 by citations
• Social Psychology — 109 citations into it; #5,925 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,068 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 42 citations into it; #2,386 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,018 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 16 citations into it; #3,264 of 3,868 by trust here, #1,003 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 9 citations into it
• Gender Studies — 9 citations into it
• Health — 9 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 8 citations into it

Whom Michael J. A. Wohl trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. N. Branscombe
2. Piers Steel
3. N. Roese
4. M. McCullough
5. Kristopher J Preacher
6. Daniel Kahneman
7. K. Markman
8. June P Tangney
9. Miles Hewstone
10. Amos Tversky

Who trusts Michael J. A. Wohl overall

1. L. Woodyatt
2. Michael Wenzel
3. M. Enzle
4. T. A. Pychyl
5. Robert J. Williams
6. Arie Nadler
7. Jochen I. Menges
8. Matthew J. Hornsey
9. Nurit Shnabel
10. Winnifred R. Louis

Papers from Michael J. A. Wohl's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Michael J. A. Wohl trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking
2. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models (Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers)
3. Counterfactual thinking.
4. The simulation heuristic
5. Self–Forgiveness: The Stepchild of Forgiveness Research
6. Forgiveness as Human Strength: Theory, Measurement, and Links to Well-Being
7. The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups
8. Constructing and reconstructing the past and the future in the present.
9. Forgiving the Self: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Findings
10. Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers.

Their papers

• Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) — 4,422 citations
• A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness (2011) — 105 citations
• Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one's group has done wrong or been wronged (2006) — 334 citations
• The past as a determinant of the present: Historical continuity, collective angst, and opposition to immigration (2012) — 163 citations
• Looking within: Measuring state self-forgiveness and its relationship to psychological well-being. (2008) — 231 citations
• Group Threat, Collective Angst, and Ingroup Forgiveness for the War in Iraq (2009) — 108 citations
• The effects of near wins and near losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behavior (2003) — 127 citations
• Counterfactual Thinking, Blame Assignment, and Well-Being in Rape Victims (2003) — 120 citations
• The trouble with trust: Time-series analysis of social capital, income inequality, and COVID-19 deaths in 84 countries (2020) — 272 citations
• Assessing the effectiveness of a responsible gambling behavioural feedback tool for reducing the gambling expenditure of at-risk players (2015) — 115 citations
• Limit your time, gamble responsibly: setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device (2014) — 121 citations
• We are sorry: Intergroup apologies and their tenuous link with intergroup forgiveness (2013) — 96 citations
• I forgive myself, now I can study: How self-forgiveness for procrastinating can reduce future procrastination (2010) — 148 citations
• The Deployment of Personal Luck: Sympathetic Magic and Illusory Control in Games of Pure Chance (2002) — 155 citations