Using the job demands-resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model
By Arnold B. Bakker, Michael Leiter. 2010
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da7636f7d17f82812ecee0b43a24a98bc9a444df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- M. Tims
- Daantje Derks
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Bruce A. Rayton
- Zeynep Y. Yalabik
- Evangelia Demerouti
- B. Shuck
- S. Frenkel
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Daantje Derks
- M. Tims
- Jae Young Lee
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Woocheol Kim
- B. Shuck
- S. Frenkel
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Tims
- Daantje Derks
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Bruce A. Rayton
- Zeynep Y. Yalabik
- B. Shuck
- Woocheol Kim
- Jiwon Park
Citations in the corpus
- Antecedents of academic performance of university students: academic engagement and psychological capital resources (2019, background): “On the other hand, the possibility of gain spirals between psychological resources and engagement entails that they may mutually foster each other (Hakanen & Roodt, 2010; Hobfoll & Shirom, 2000).”
- Development and validation of the job crafting scale (2012, background): “Furthermore, job resources are able to buffer the negative effects of job demands and may particularly lead to high levels of work engagement when job demands are high as well (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Hakanen & Roodt, 2010).”
- What Is a Resource: Toward a Taxonomy of Resources for Employee Engagement (2020, background): “…2007; Conway, Fu, Monks, Alfes, & Bailey, 2016; Farndale & Murrer, 2015), and the resource term connected to the JDR model has been conceptualized at the job level (Hakanen & Roodt, 2010) as well as at the organizational, interpersonal, job, and task levels (e.g., Bakker & Demerouti, 2007).”
- The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work–Life Balance in Organizations: A Review of the Empirical Research (2020, methodology): “According to the JD-R model, high job resources can increase work engagement, while high job demands can result in burnout (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Hakanen & Roodt, 2010).”
- Work engagement, psychological contract breach and job satisfaction (2014, methodology): “Increases in resources augment both employee well-being and engagement, while engaged employees also exert effort to create, receive and protect resources (Hakanen and Roodt 2010).”
- Explaining supervisor–subordinate guanxi and subordinate performance through a conservation of resources lens (2019, methodology): “Job resources was measured using 12 items in three subscales representing job autonomy (at the task level), supervisor support (at the interpersonal level), and developmental opportunities (at the organizational level) (Bakker and Demerouti, 2007; Bakker et al., 2004; Hakanen and Roodt, 2010).”