Approaches to Learning by Students in the Biological Sciences: Implications for teaching
By Dianne J. Watters, James J. Watters. 2007
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d64c1650d3211dc7dc2248a8af1ad6f6c110edd2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
- Liisa Postareff
- Sari Lindblom-Ylänne
- A. Parpala
- Telle Hailikari
- V. Virtanen
- Marjo Vesalainen
- Henna Rytkönen
- A. Kara
Citations in the corpus
- Factors affecting bioscience students’ academic achievement (2012, background): “Several studies have shown a relationship between approaches to learning and study success (Diseth 2003; Watters and Watters 2007 ).”
- Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning (2021, background): “Thus, the ultimate aim of constructive aligned teaching is to design teaching so that it promotes students’ deep approach to learning which is more likely to enhance deep understanding and lead to higher quality learning outcomes (e.g. Entwistle, 2018; Trigwell, 2012; Watters and Watters, 2007).”
- ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? (2022, unknown): “[25](1) note that these types of assessments comprising essays and short-answer responses are generally perceived by educators to be more suitable at measuring critical thinking [22] as well as facilitating deeper learning [24, 26].”
- The Effect of a 'Learning Theories' Unit on Students' Attitudes Toward Learning (2009, background): “The participants in this study, as did those in that of Watters & Watters (2007) , enjoyed learning.”