The Analysis of Participation in Small Groups

By J. Bonito. 2002

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d60cae8454d38c64d95a8ab2ef109019ee482c4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Fred Paas
2. Paul A. Kirschner
3. Femke C. Kirschner
4. Jeroen Janssen
5. David A. Kenny
6. K. Chan
7. Gijsbert Erkens
8. Jos G. M. Jaspers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul A. Kirschner
2. K. Chan
3. C. K. Yim
4. David A. Kenny
5. Jan-Willem Strijbos
6. Femke C. Kirschner
7. Fred Paas
8. Karel Kreijns

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Paul A. Kirschner
2. David A. Kenny
3. Femke C. Kirschner
4. Fred Paas
5. Jeroen Janssen
6. W. Cook

Citations in the corpus

• The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies (2005, methodology): “Additionally, the model has been recommended in the area of the study of families (Rayens & Svavardottir, 2003), close relationships (Campbell & Kashy, 2002), small groups (Bonito, 2002), and as a framework for evaluating treatment outcomes in couple therapy (Cook, 1998; Cook & Snyder, in press).”
• Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. (2011, methodology): “Multilevel analysis (MLA) can cope with this nonindependence and is therefore a more appropriate technique (Bonito, 2002; Snijders & Bosker, 1999).”
• Designing electronic collaborative learning environments (2004, background): “Multilevel modeling appears better suited to investigate questionnaire data that consist of individual self-report perceptions of group-level variables (cf. Bonito, 2002 ).”
• Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? (2007, background): “However, it is important to note that students’ participation rates are most likely nonindependent (Bonito, 2002; Kenny, Mannetti, Pierro, Livi, & Kashy, 2002).”
• Do Customers and Employees Enjoy Service Participation? Synergistic Effects of Self- and Other-Efficacy (2012, background): “Second, employees could demonstrate a strong motivation and readiness to coproduce with customers because people rely on these cues to form perceptions of their partners’ efficacy (Bonito 2002; Jackson, Knapp, and Beauchamp 2008; Snyder and Stukas 1999).”