PARSING STRATEGIES IN L1 AND L2 SENTENCE PROCESSING

By Despina Papadopoulou, Harald Clahsen. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2003

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d492511d130ffb0736535802f17005c77342c3e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals (2007, background): “…Afrikaans (Mitchell, Brysbaert, Grondelaers and Swanepoel, 2000), Dutch (Brysbaert and Mitchell, 1996; Mitchell et al., 2000), German (Hemforth, Konieczny and Scheepers, 2000), French (Zagar, Pynte and Rativeau, 1997; Frenck-Mestre and Pynte, 2000a, b), and Greek (Papadopoulou and Clahsen, 2003).”
Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing (2011, unknown): “…studies showing that learners’ syntactic processing abilities may be reduced or less automatized compared to native speakers’ (Felser & Roberts, 2007; Felser, Roberts, Gross, & Marinis, 2003; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Marinis, Roberts, Felser, & Clahsen, 2005; Papadopoulou & Clahsen, 2003).”
Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: a cross-modal priming study (2007, background): “A reduced reliance on phrase structure based parsing routines has also been reported in studies examining L2 ambiguity resolution (Felser et al., 2003; Papadopoulou and Clahsen, 2003).”
Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, background): “…proposed to explain reduced or absent structure-based effects in L2 learners’ processing of temporary syntactic ambiguities and filler-gap dependencies (e.g., Felser & Roberts, 2007; Felser, Roberts, Marinis, & Gross, 2003; Marinis, Roberts, Felser, & Clahsen, 2005; Papadopoulou & Clahsen, 2003).”
SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN L2 LEARNERS (2003, background): “In a self-paced reading study, Papadopoulou and Clahsen (2003) examined how Spanish, German, and Russian L2 speakers of Greek resolved RC ambiguities when reading Greek equivalents of sentences such as A man called the studentMASC of the teacherFEM who was disappointedMASC by the new educational…”
Grammatical processing in language learners (2006, methodology): “Although the extent to which properties of a learner’s L1 influence their real-time processing of the L2 input remains to be determined, studies by Felser et al. (2003) and Papadopoulou and Clahsen (2003) provide evidence against the transfer of L1 ambiguity resolution preferences.”
Continuity and shallow structures in language processing (2006, background): “Although this is correct, we think that the effects observed by Papadopoulou and Clahsen (2003) provide strong evidence against transfer and input-driven accounts of L2 processing.”
Parsing a first language like a second: The erosion of L1 parsing strategies in Spanish-English Bilinguals (2004, background): “In a self-paced reading study, Papadopoulou and Clahsen (2003) examined how Spanish, German and Russian L2 speakers of Greek resolved relative clause ambiguities when reading Greek equivalents of sentences such as A man called the student (masc) of the teacher (fem) who was disappointed (masc) by…”
Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap* (2012, background): “A growing number of studies has investigated sentence processing in L2 learners (Jiang, 2007; Papadopoulou & Clahsen, 2003; see also Papadopoulou, 2005 for a review of studies on ambiguity resolution in L2).”
Children's Processing of Ambiguous Sentences: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment (2003, background): “…Spanish (Carreiras and Clifton (1993), Gilboy, Sopena, Clifton, and Frazier (1995)), Dutch (Brysbaert and Mitchell (1996)), German (Hemforth, Konieczny, and Scheepers (2000)), French (Frenck-Mestre and Pynte (1997), Zagar, Pynte, and Rativeau (1997)), and Greek (Papadopoulou and Clahsen (2003)).”
SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS (2017, background): “For illustration, consider our findings on relative clause ambiguities (Felser, Roberts, Gross, & Marinis, 2003; Papadopoulou & Clahsen, 2003), to which such statements are often explicitly related.”
ONLINE PRONOUN RESOLUTION IN L2 DISCOURSE: L1 Influence and General Learner Effects (2008, background): “…are less able to use syntactic information effectively online in contrast to native speakers and that they overrely on lexical , pragmatic , or contextual information , or a combination of these , to compensate ~ Clahsen & Felser , 2006 ; Marinis et al +, 2005 ; Papadopoulou & Clahsen , 2003 !”
The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance* (2009, background): “From this perspective, L1 differences in off-line tasks may not surface in L2 processing of morphosyntax Felser, Roberts, Marinis and Gross, 2003; (Papadopoulou and Clahsen, 2003; Marinis, Roberts, Felser and Clahsen, 2005) because the general demands of L2 processing render the activation of…”