The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance*

By Holger Hopp. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2009

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective* (2012, methodology): “Hopp (2009) used a timed web-based C-test (Grotjahn, 2002) to screen subjects.”
Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism (2011, background): “John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved exception is Hopp (2007, 2009, 2010), who carried out a detailed investigation of the late stages of acquisition of scrambling in embedded clauses in L2 German by L1 speakers of Dutch, English and Russian at advanced and near-native levels (more…”
Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form (2017, background): “…that proficiency did not play a more important role was somewhat surprising given ample evidence for the role of proficiency both with regard to sensitivity to discourse-level properties in L2 (e.g., Hopp, 2009) and facilitation in sentence-level L2 processing (e.g., Chambers & Cooke, 2009).”
Age Effects in Second Language Learning: Stepping Stones Toward Better Understanding (2013, background): “…can be teased apart, whether they be called implicit/explicit (DeKeyser, 2000; Paradis, 2009), conscious/unconscious (Abrahamsson, 2012), declarative/procedural (Ullman, 2001, 2005; see also Paradis, 2009), or representation/processing (Hopp, 2009, 2010; Juffs & Harrington, 1995; McDonald, 2006).”