Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing

By Leah Roberts, Claudia Felser. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2011

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50f2d406e43d0c7c65ce4a368dcb798517ff3740

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Claudia Felser
2. Harald Clahsen
3. Paola E. Dussias
4. Pilar Piñar
5. Ian Cunnings
6. Holger Hopp
7. A. Sorace
8. T. Marinis

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Harald Clahsen
2. Claudia Felser
3. Pilar Piñar
4. Paola E. Dussias
5. Ian Cunnings
6. Holger Hopp
7. A. Sorace
8. Judith F. Kroll

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Claudia Felser
2. Paola E. Dussias
3. Harald Clahsen
4. Pilar Piñar
5. Ian Cunnings

Citations in the corpus

• SOME NOTES ON THE SHALLOW STRUCTURE HYPOTHESIS (2017, methodology): “A preference for the simplest analysis compatible with the current input, for example, has also been observed in L2 processing (e.g., Roberts & Felser, 2011).”
• Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers (2010, background): “Similarly, Felser and Roberts (2004) found that Greek learners of English were strongly influenced by plausibility and had difficulty recovering from misanalysis when deciding if a post-verbal NP functioned as a direct object or as an embedded subject (e.g.”