Emotion regulation in leader–follower relationships
By Lars Glasø, Staale Einarsen. 2008
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2cd8b56d673fa57864d3389dc4c756a709996be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Ashlea Troth
- Herman H. M. Tse
- Amy L Collins
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- Amy Wax
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Ying Hong
- Leslie A. DeChurch
In Social Psychology
- Ashlea Troth
- Amy L Collins
- Herman H. M. Tse
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- Amy Wax
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Ying Hong
- Leslie A. DeChurch
In Sociology and Political Science
- Herman H. M. Tse
- Neal M. Ashkanasy
- Ashlea Troth
- Amy L Collins
- Amy Wax
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- Ying Hong
- Leslie A. DeChurch
Citations in the corpus
- Leader emergence: the role of emotional intelligence and motivation to lead (2011, background): “The ability to understand and regulate emotions, although an important precursor to successful intrapersonal and interpersonal development, may bear less of a direct effect on one’s desire to be a leader, instead exerting more of an effect on leader-follower relationships (Glasø and Einarsen, 2008).”
- Affect and leader-member exchange in the new millennium: A state-of-art review and guiding framework (2017, background): “For example, while emotional regulation and LMX might be negatively related for particular strategies such as surface acting (Glasø & Einarsen, 2008), there is evidence to suggest mixed effects for deep acting (e.g., in the case of deep acting by leaders; Fisk & Friesen, 2012) and largely positive…”
- Moving emotional labor beyond surface and deep acting (2012, background): “Although emotional labor is relevant to the experience of work regardless of the occupation (Glasø & Einarsen, 2008), there are some professions in which employees are more prone to engage in emotional labor.”
- Perceptions of leader emotion regulation and LMX as predictors of followers' job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors (2012, unknown): “LMX theory describes leaders and followers in high-quality exchange relationships as being psychologically close, suggesting that a leader will be less likely to fake or suppress emotions when interacting with individuals he or she shares a positive connection with (Glasø & Einarsen, 2008).”