A Conceptual Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity

By Susan R. Jones, Marylu K. McEwen. 2000

758 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d199c12dfbe917f02c80ecb85d1ebb8d64484fa2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. F. Harris
2. Susan R. Jones
3. Keith E. Edwards
4. Elisa S. Abes
5. Susan R. Komives
6. Vasti Torres
7. Corey B. Rumann
8. Susan D Longerbeam

Citations in the corpus

• A story to tell: the identity development of women growing up as third culture kids (2009, background): “Our core identity, or ‘‘inside self’’ consists of personal attributes and characteristics, and our ‘‘outside’’ identity or facts of identity are easily named by others, such as race, gender, and nationality (Jones & McEwen, 2000).”
• Ethnic Minority-Majority Status and Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Perceived Discrimination (2011, background): “However, some researchers have failed to find racial or ethnic differences in perceived discrimination (Kessler et al., 1999, Taylor & Turner, 2002). This may be because Kessler et al. (1999) operationalized discrimination broadly to include any type of discrimination and did not assess reasons for ”
• Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual College Student Experiences: An Exploratory Study (2007, unknown): “It may also be that the cognitive processes associated with developing an identity that is not part of the dominant group assist lesbian and gay students in their ability to think with more complexity about broader intellectual and social issues (Jones & McEwen, 2000).”
• Interview Strategies for Assessing Self-Authorship: Constructing Conversations to Assess Meaning Making (2007, background): “Just as complex knowledge construction requires integrating disparate information, complex identity construction requires integrating various characteristics to form a coherent identity (Jones & McEwen, 2000).”
• Reconstructing Latino Identity: The Influence of Cognitive Development on the Ethnic Identity Process of Latino Students (2004, background): “This understanding of identity places the “self” as central to the construction of knowledge that involves multiple dimensions (Jones & McEwen, 2000).”
• Constructing Identities at the Intersections: An Autoethnographic Exploration of Multiple Dimensions of Identity (2009, background): “…identities is needed. the central Role of context Contextual influences have been addressed in previous research on identity construction (e.g., Abes et al., 2007; Jones, 1997; Jones & McEwen, 2000) however, our autoethnographic research more clearly illuminated the central role context plays.”
• College Men’s Meanings of Masculinities and Contextual Influences: Toward a Conceptual Model (2010, methodology): “their departure from Wallbrook is unknown, which raises the question, “How do meanings of masculinities change and develop between men’s initial enrollment and graduation from the institution?” Engaging in longitudinal studies similar to those conducted by Josselson (1987), Baxter Magolda (2001), an”
• Student Veterans in Transition: Re-enrolling after War Zone Deployments (2010, methodology): “Consequently, we also incorporated the multiple dimensions of identity model (Abes, Jones, & McEwen, 2007; Jones & McEwen, 2000) into our theoretical and analytical framework.”
• What Is Diversity? (2010, background): “In particular, theories of simultaneous multiple identities (Jones & McEwen, 2000; Stewart, 2002) and multicultural theory (Phinney, Furguson, & Tate, 1997) serve as tools for the deconstruction of multiculturalism and diversity.”
• The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment (2008, background): “The recommended value is 200 or above; values of less than 75 indicate poor-fitting models (Kenny, 2008). groups, and social status are diverse dimensions of an individual's identity (Jones & McEwen, 2000; Kotler & Armstrong, 2008).”
• Role of electronic word-of-mouth content and valence in influencing online purchase behavior (2018, background): “The causal relationship between categories was also developed by checking how experts explained how the variation in one category affected the other category (Corbin and Strauss 1990; Jones and McEwen 2000).”
• A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory (2006, background): “The study of social identities (e.g., race, sexual orientation, gender, class) and the interactions among identities (Jones & McEwen, 2000; McEwen, 2003b; Weber, 2001) are well established in the literature.”
• Perspectives on Identity, Disclosure, and the Campus Environment Among African American Gay and Bisexual Men at One Historically Black College (2011, background): “Aside from the Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity (MMDI); (Jones & McEwen, 2000), many student development theories explore the processes of sexual and racial identities as if they are mutually exclusive processes.”
• A Developmental Model of Intercultural Maturity (2005, unknown): “…an intercultural dimension (Baxter Magolda, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003; Baxter Magolda & King, 2004; M. Bennett, 1993; Bidell, Lee, Boucie, Ward, & Brass, 1994; Jones & McEwen, 2000; Kegan, 1994; King & Baxter Magolda, 1996; Knefelkamp, 2005; Mentkowski & Associates, 2000; Ortiz, 2000; Storti, 1990).”
• Perceptions of Multiple Identities Among Black College Students (2009, background): “Some of these studies also reported findings that pictured the interplay of social and cultural identities and personality characteristics and roles as a conflict at times between externally defined identities and internally chosen and defined ones (Jones, 1997; Jones & McEwen, 2000; Stewart, 2002).”
• Meaning-Making Capacity and the Dynamics of Lesbian College Students' Multiple Dimensions of Identity (2004, methodology): “Filtered Influence of Contextual Influences on the Content of Lesbian Identity Participants who were approaching an internally defined identity were less dependent on contextual influences to define the content of their identity.”