A Leadership Identity Development Model: Applications from a Grounded Theory

By Susan R. Komives, Susan D Longerbeam, Julie E. Owen, Felicia C Mainella, Laura Osteen. 2006

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Influences on College Students' Capacities for Socially Responsible Leadership (2010, background): “Leadership is inherently a group phenomenon (Northouse, 2006; Rost, 1991), and much of college is developmentally dedicated to a broadening sense of self in the context of others (Baxter Magolda, 1998; Komives et al., 2006).”
The benefits of a long-lens approach to leader development: Understanding the seeds of leadership (2011, methodology): “Following Komives et al. (2006) model, or an alternative model, it is relevant to understand and explore the effects of different developmental trajectories on the development of one's leadership identity.”
Leadership Identity Development: Challenges in Applying a Developmental Model (2009, background): “For these college students the key transition in this model was at the end of Stage Three (Leader Identified) when students began to value their interdependence with others.”
Student Leadership: Necessary Research (2007, background): “Komives et al. (2005) convincingly demonstrate, through their intensive study of student leaders that the appropriate focus for inquiry is a first-principles understanding of how young people develop and negotiate their leadership identities.”