Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions for Students in the Primary Grades

By R. Gersten, Kelly S. Haymond, Rebecca Newman-Gonchar, Joseph A. Dimino, Madhavi Jayanthi. 2020

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract This meta-analysis systematically reviewed the most up-to-date literature to determine the effectiveness of reading interventions on measures of word and pseudoword reading, reading comprehension, and passage fluency, and to determine the role intervention and study variables play in moderating the impacts for students at risk for reading difficulties in Grades 1–3. We used random-effects meta-regression models with robust variance estimates to summarize overall effects and to explore potential moderator effects. Results from a total of 33 rigorous experimental and quasi-experimental studies conducted between 2002 and 2017 that met WWC evidence standards revealed a significant positive effect for reading interventions on reading outcomes, with a mean effect size of 0.39 (SE = .04, p < .001, 95% CI [0.32, 0.46]). Moderator analyses demonstrated that mean effects varied across outcome domains and areas of instruction.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d09c683df9f20a4f253eb700b3736d3a8a53a976

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Cynthia Lake
  2. R. Slavin
  3. Marta Pellegrini
  4. Amanda J. Neitzel
  5. Alan C. K. Cheung
  6. Van-Dat Tran
  7. Ehsan Namaziandost
  8. Mehdi Nasri

In Statistics and Probability

  1. R. Slavin
  2. Cynthia Lake
  3. Marta Pellegrini
  4. Amanda J. Neitzel

Citations in the corpus