Study Groups as a Form of Professional Development for Secondary Mathematics Teachers
By F. Arbaugh. 2003
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfec0f6eede5b69d5dd96c6f4282bb69e6bcfaae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers' classrooms (2009, background): “, Arbaugh et al, 2006; Remillard, 1999; Smith, 2000), or by organizing teachers into communities of learners that work together to improve their practice (Arbaugh, 2003; Fernandez, 2005; Stein, Silver, & Smith, 1998).”
- A Longitudinal Study of Teacher Change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study (2005, background): “Other activities, for example study groups sustained across time, can have very beneficial effects not only on the self-efficacy of the teachers but also on building community and relationships, making connections across theory and practice, curriculum reform, and developing a sense of professionali”
- Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers’ professional development (2008, background): “and confirmed collegiality at the same time (Little 1987), resulting in mutual contradictions and supplementation ( Arbaugh 2003; Lachance and Confrey 2003).”