Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Systematic Reflection (2014, background): “…organizational, social, and medical psychology, reflecting on successful and failed experiences has been shown to improve task performance (e.g., Anseel et al., 2009; Ellis & Davidi, 2005; Ellis et al., 2006; Kray, Galinsky, & Markman, 2009; Vashdi, Bamberger, Erez, & Weiss-Meilik, 2007; Wong,…”
Making Experience Count: The Role of Reflection in Individual Learning (2016, methodology): “We bridge this firm-level scholarship in strategy to research in organizational behavior and cognitive psychology examining learning at a more micro level (Anseel, Lievens, and Schollaert, 2009; Schippers, Homan, and van Krippenberg, 2013; Ellis et al., 2014; Schippers, Edmondson, and West, 2014).”
Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states (2015, methodology): “As in previous studies (Anseel et al., 2009; Gordijn, Postmes, & De Vries, 2001; Shiv, Britton, & Payne, 2004), we used the number of words used during the reflexivity session as an indicator of depth of processing.”
Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance (2012, background): “Reflection on the feedback is supposed to add to the effect of feedback on performance because it directs the feedback recipient’s attention to the task level (cf. Anseel et al., 2009).”