Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance

By H. Duijnhouwer, Frans J. Prins, K. Stokking. 2012

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d488ba41e68f0db9e5fddaf23e630db592319fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick
2. L. Smith
3. Adam J. Bridgeman
4. Manjula D. Sharma
5. Richard A. Walker
6. Erika A. Patall
7. Sandra Stautberg
8. Carlton J. Fong

In Education

1. Ariana C. Vasquez
2. Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick
3. L. Smith
4. Adam J. Bridgeman
5. Manjula D. Sharma
6. Richard A. Walker
7. Erika A. Patall
8. Sandra Stautberg

Citations in the corpus

• The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy (2016, background): “…Freudenberg, Brimble, and Cameron (2010), Cheong (2010), Cheung, Li, and Yee (2003), Baker et al. (2007), Govaere, de Kruif, and Valcke (2012), Duijnhouwer, Prins, and Stokking (2012); Experiment 2, Kim, Baylor, and Shen (2007), Koh et al. (2010), Macaskill and Denovan (2013), Malmberg and…”
• A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation (2018, background): “…or feedback geared toward task improvement, is known in the field as a variety of terms: formative feedback (Shute 2008), corrective feedback (Hattie and Timperley 2007), constructive feedback (Duijnhouwer et al. 2012; Fong et al. 2016), and effectance-relevant feedback (Deci and Ryan 2016).”