The Job Satisfaction-Productivity Nexus: A Study Using Matched Survey and Register Data

By P. Böckerman, P. Ilmakunnas. 2012

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd62ba580ccb77888ac0597904bdd5fb72b58e14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Louis Tay
2. Alex Bryson
3. J. De Neve
4. Richard E. Lucas
5. E. Diener
6. F. Cnossen
7. S. Oishi
8. L. Stokes

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. E. Diener
2. Richard E. Lucas
3. J. De Neve
4. L. Stokes
5. F. Cnossen
6. Milena Nikolova
7. Sajad Rezaei
8. Cihan Cobanoglu

In Social Psychology

1. E. Diener
2. Louis Tay
3. S. Oishi
4. Richard E. Lucas
5. J. De Neve
6. Milena Nikolova
7. Sonja Lyubomirsky
8. C. Xuereb

Citations in the corpus

• Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being (2018, positive): “Bockerman and Ilmakunnas (2012) found that manufacturing plants with higher employee job satisfaction were more productive.”
• A Scientific Review of the Remarkable Benefits of Happiness for Successful and Healthy Living (2013, background): “Bockerman and Ilmakunnas (2012) found that job satisfaction predicts the productivity of manufacturing plants.”
• Does employees’ subjective well-being affect workplace performance? (2017, background): “results are consistent with Böckerman and Ilmakunnas (2012) who found a positive association between mean job satisfaction and workplace performance in their manufacturing study for Finland.”
• Happiness at work (2017, neutral): “32 See, e.g., Freeman (1978); Harter et al. (2002, 2003); Bockerman and Ilmakunnas (2012), Judge et al (2001).”
• The structural relationship between TQM, employee satisfaction and hotel performance (2017, background): “, 2006; Böckerman and Ilmakunnas, 2012), high labor turnover (Chi and Gursoy, 2009; Silvestro, 2002) and low productivity (Böckerman and Ilmakunnas, 2012).”
• What makes work meaningful and why economists should care about it (2020, background): “Job satisfaction is also instrumentally important for productivity (Böckerman and Ilmakunnas, 2012).”
• The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being (2013, background): “Bockerman and Ilmakunnas (2012) found that job satisfaction predicts the productivity of manufacturing plants.”