The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences
By Erwin Danneels. 2002
2,495 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb91582dcb220dee28e40c6b309d126e26d9202a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Justin Paul
- R. Duane Ireland
- Nadine H. Kammerlander
- Rajshree Agarwal
- Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke
- Henk W. Volberda
- Pervaiz K. Ahmed
- Catherine L. Wang
In Strategy and Management
- Henk W. Volberda
- Ram Mudambi
- Justin Paul
- Mike W. Peng
- Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
- Luis Filipe Lages
- K. Meyer
- Oliver Gassmann
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter‐organizational knowledge flows (2010, neutral): “The literature on new product development has obtained a similar conclusion (Danneels, 2002).”
- Innovation as a Knowledge-Based Outcome (2011, background): “] Conversely, exploitative innovations are incremental innovations and are designed to meet the needs of existing customers of markets (Benner and Tushman, 2002, p. 243; Danneels, 2002).”
- THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING (2007, background): “Danneels (2002) defined a second-order marketing competence as the ability of a firm to build new market-related resources, enabling it to address new markets.”
- Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda (2007, background): “studies pertinent to dynamic capabilities have largely focused on new product development only as an internal enabler for firm change and renewal (Dougherty 1992; Daneels 2002).”
- The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm Growth (2005, background): “In terms of previous conceptual frameworks, the exploitation of an inside track thus represents a strategy based on developing new products and technologies for existing customers (Ansoff, 1965; Danneels, 2002).”
- The Influence of Prior Industry Affiliation on Framing in Nascent Industries: The Evolution of Digital Cameras (2012, background): “The convergence of firms with diverse backgrounds in a new domain could provide an opportunity to explore the origins of heterogeneity, however, existing research has emphasized only the differential capabilities associated with prior industry experience, showing that firms with related experience a”
- Management Control and Strategic Renewal in the Front End of Innovation (2009, methodology): “This study’s measures for technology and market uncertainty take into account industry and company perspectives (Garcia and Calantone, 2002) and use of competences (Danneels, 2002), and they were modified based on the variables used by Danneels and Kleinschmidt (2001).”
- Why New Business Development Projects Fail: Coping with the Differences of Technological Versus Market Knowledge (2007, background): “However, Danneels suggested that an important distinction should be made between technological and market knowledge, as it has been argued that NBD projects might create one type of knowledge and leverage another.(6) Technological knowledge refers to knowledge associated with products, technologies ”
- Creating incentives for innovation? The relationship between pay dispersion in R&D groups and firm innovation performance (2013, background): “Innovation has long been recognized as a crucial component of competitive strategy (Banbury and Mitchell, 1995; Danneels, 2002).”