Beginning English Teacher Attrition, Mobility, and Retention

By Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn, Lisa Scherff. 2008

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb43124eea205a4fbd2ffd5e2edc66ef9e41ad9d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Induction and Mentoring Programs for Beginning Teachers (2011, methodology): “In other words, the SASS/TFS data do not support longitudinal analysis of more than one cohort, as Hahs-Vaughn and Scherff (2008) sought to do.”
Teacher Retention: Teacher Characteristics, School Characteristics, Organizational Characteristics, and Teacher Efficacy (2012, unknown): “…with salary is often the most cited reason for leaving teaching (Allred & Smith, 1984; Borman & Dowling, 2006; Brill & McCartney, 2008; Hahs-Vaughn & Scherff, 2008; Hall, Pearson, & Carroll, 1992; Hanushek et al., 2004; Ingersoll, 2001; Ingersoll & Smith, 2003; Kelly, 2004; Kersaint,…”
Teachers' exit decisions: An investigation into the reasons why newly qualified teachers fail to enter the teaching profession or why those who do enter do not continue teaching (2014, background): “Attrition is regarded by many as an important determinant in the ineffectiveness, low performance (Ingersoll, 2001) or lack of Educational Sciences Depart629 11 32. truyven), Gert.vanthournout@ quality in contemporary education (Hahs-Vaughn & Scherff, 2008).”
Who Will Stay and Who Will Leave? Predicting Secondary English Teacher Attrition Risk (2010, background): “…research examining teacher attrition, migration, and retention issues, generally confirming that the influences on teacher retention differ even among similar specialties (e.g., Boe, Cook, & Sunderland, 2008; Borman & Dowling, 2008; Hahs-Vaughn & Scherff, 2008; Hancock, 2008; Ingersoll, 2006).”
Teacher Attrition and Retention Research in Australia: Towards a New Theoretical Framework (2015, unknown): “Cross-sectional data is collected in four-year cycles, meaning that trends can be revealed over time, and the datasets have provided the basis for a large number of studies on teacher attrition and retention in the United States (Cannaday, 2011; Ingersoll, 2001; Hahs-Vaughn & Scherff, 2008).”