It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception

By A. Russell, Susan T. Fiske. 2008

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cae4a25a419b61c8cf0cab123c23d310df9ba586

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Alison R. Fragale
2. Nicolas Kervyn
3. Chris Malone
4. M. V. van Engen
5. Bertolt Meyer
6. Denise Lewin Loyd
7. H. Dijk
8. Susan T. Fiske

In Social Psychology

1. Jennifer R. Overbeck
2. Margaret A. Neale
3. Nicolas Kervyn
4. Denise Lewin Loyd
5. Alison R. Fragale
6. Chris Malone
7. M. V. van Engen
8. Bertolt Meyer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jennifer R. Overbeck
2. Nicolas Kervyn
3. Margaret A. Neale
4. Denise Lewin Loyd
5. Chris Malone
6. Alison R. Fragale
7. Chieh-Peng Lin
8. M. V. van Engen

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition (2014, background): “Previous research of empowerment posits that empowerment in workplaces mediates the relationship between the social structural context (e.g. within-team competition) (Russell and Fiske, 2008) and team flexibility (Li et al., 2010; Spreitzer, 1995b).”
• Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception (2012, background): “As a matter of fact, the Stereotype Content Model has been shown to apply to person perception (Russell & Fiske, 2008), when individual people meet someone expected to be high or low status (predicting competence) and cooperative or competitive (predicting warmth).”
• Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure (2018, unknown): “Experimental vignettes manipulating the cooperativeness and status of hypothetical groups support the hypothesized causal patterns (Caprariello, Cuddy, & Fiske, 2009), as do in-person laboratory encounters with parallel manipulations (Russell & Fiske, 2008).”
• Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “The SCM also predicts that stereotype-based judgments result from socio-structural relations in two ways (Fiske et al., 2002; Russell & Fiske, 2008).”
• Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets' power and status positions (2011, background): “Whereas Conway et al. (1996) found that status was negatively associated with perceptions of target warmth, Russell and Fiske (2008) found no relationship between target status and warmth.”