Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers
By Holger Hopp. 2010
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c85c9485b80cf26c3d172f26f640ac3effe54fd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ian Cunnings
- Holger Hopp
- Annie Tremblay
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- A. Sorace
- Leah Roberts
- S. A. Liszka
- R. Dekeyser
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ian Cunnings
- Holger Hopp
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Annie Tremblay
- Monika S. Schmid
- A. Sorace
- Leah Roberts
- S. Montrul
In Language and Linguistics
- Ian Cunnings
- Holger Hopp
- S. Montrul
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
- Leah Roberts
- Monika S. Schmid
- Annie Tremblay
- R. Dekeyser
Citations in the corpus
- Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism (2011, background): “John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved exception is Hopp (2007, 2009, 2010), who carried out a detailed investigation of the late stages of acquisition of scrambling in embedded clauses in L2 German by L1 speakers of Dutch, English and Russian at advanced and near-native levels (more…”
- Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing (2016, background): “…in the L1 and L2 made by the SSH, others argue that L1 and L2 sentence processing is fundamentally similar, and maintain that purported differences result from inefficient lexical access routines or from an increased burden on capacity-limited cognitive resources (McDonald, 2006; Hopp, 2006, 2010).”
- Age Effects in Second Language Learning: Stepping Stones Toward Better Understanding (2013, background): “…can be teased apart, whether they be called implicit/explicit (DeKeyser, 2000; Paradis, 2009), conscious/unconscious (Abrahamsson, 2012), declarative/procedural (Ullman, 2001, 2005; see also Paradis, 2009), or representation/processing (Hopp, 2009, 2010; Juffs & Harrington, 1995; McDonald, 2006).”
- An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? (2014, background): “ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 25 September 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01072”
- TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, neutral): “As a case in point, in his fourth experiment, Hopp ( 2010 ) strongly increased the time pressure in a written GJT administered to native German speakers.”
- Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, methodology): “This can be so even if the morphological feature to be learned is instantiated in the native language (e.g., Hopp, 2010).”
- Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability (2013, background): “In reaction-time and eye tracking studies, very advanced L2ers fail to compute non-adjacent determiner–noun agreement at elevated processing speed (Hopp, 2010), and they show contingencies between accuracy on non-local adjective–noun gender agreement with proficiency (Sagarra and Herschensohn,…”
- Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism (2011, background): “…affects strategies and mechanisms of L1 and L2 processing (e.g., Dussias, 2004), as well as the speed of processing in either language (e.g., Hopp, 2010; McDonald, 2000), even if both languages are acquired from early childhood (Foursha, Austin, & van de Walle, 2005; Proverbio, Cok, & Zani,…”
- Processing tense/aspect-agreement violations on-line in the second language: A self-paced reading study with French and German L2 learners of English (2013, background): “L1 influences were also found in Hopp (2006, 2010), in learners’ processing of case-marking and subject–verb agreement of German L2 at advanced, versus near-native levels of proficiency.”
- Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition (2016, background): “…to emulate L2-like performance in native speakers relied on task manipulations that put natives under increased processing pressure by speeding up stimulus presentation, restricting response times and/ or degrading the stimulus (e.g. Hopp, 2010; Lopez-Prego and Gabriele, 2014; McDonald, 2006).”