Incubators: Tool for Entrepreneurship?
By Rudy Aernoudt. 2004
585 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c78f85a62ec4d4a76ef4767b1bd441f7c1922f68
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Frank J. van Rijnsoever
- M. Schwartz
- Mike Wright
- Bart Clarysse
- Johanna Vanderstraeten
- Lise Aaboen
- Danny Soetanto
- P. Matthyssens
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Frank J. van Rijnsoever
- M. Schwartz
- Johanna Vanderstraeten
- P. Matthyssens
- Mike Wright
- Bart Clarysse
- T. Ratinho
- Elsa Henriques
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Frank J. van Rijnsoever
- M. Schwartz
- Johanna Vanderstraeten
- P. Matthyssens
- Laurel F. Ofstein
- J. Sten
- Chris P. Eveleens
- Jill R. Kickul
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator (2016, background): “Research on incubation models has provided in-depth insights into the differences in the organization, activities, services and objectives of incubator types (Aernoudt, 2004).”
- Start-ups (2005, background): “…supporters of functional business International Small Business Journal Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi) http://isb.sagepub.com [DOI: 10.1177/0266242605055909] Vol 23(5): 487–511 isbj networks (Aernoudt, 2004; Bøllingtoft and Ulhøi, 2005; Hansen et al., 2000).”
- Explaining incubators using firm analogy (2009, methodology): “What is called an incubator in Europe differs from country to country (Aernoudt, 2004). Clarysse et al. (2005) found three different incubation models based on the activities and resources used and von Zedtwitz and Grimaldi (2006) found five types of incubators based on the management of the core se”
- How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories (2017, background): “Incubation of technology-based start-ups has received considerable attention from policymakers and business people for its promise to contribute to technology transfer and entrepreneurship (Aernoudt 2004; Clarysse et al. 2005; Phan et al. 2005).”
- Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, the survival rates reported by Aernoudt (2004) and the European Commission (2002) are not reached, which might also be explained by the lower age of the incubators involved in these two studies, though this suggestion cannot be tested.”
- Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth (2009, background): “Despite many studies on ways to develop and improve incubation programs (e.g. Aernoudt 2004; Clarysse et al. 2005; Rothaermel and Thursby 2005) evidence on how academic spin-offs’ needs for resources change with age in a longitudinal way is scarce, but attention is increasing (e.g. McAdam and…”
- Incubator best practice: A framework (2008, background): “However, most researchers seem to agree that incubation is related to the early phase of a venture’s life (see e.g. Aernoudt, 2004; Bhabra-Remedios and Cornelius, 2003; Grimaldi and Grandi, 2005; Hackett and Dilts, 2004a; Lindelöf and Löfsten, 2004).”
- The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations (2012, background): “This echoes the commonalities found between other definitions advanced by industry associations (NBIA, 2007; UKBI, 2007), large scale studies (EC, 2002; OECD, 1997) and in academic work (Aernoudt, 2004; Sherman and Chappell, 1998) (Table 1).”
- Knowledge flow in Technological Business Incubators: Evidence from Australia and Israel (2015, background): “Technovation (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.002i are often targeted towards establishing innovative start-ups, and in France and the Netherlands, the university incubator model is often promoted to commercialize research knowledge (Aernoudt, 2004).”
- Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany (2010, background): “BI support mechanisms concentrate on the generation, complement, enhancement and exploitation of the resource base of new ventures (Aernoudt, 2004; Hytti and Mäki, 2007; McAdam and McAdam, 2008) and, therefore, focus on the compensation of early-stage resource deficits to ensure economic growth…”
- Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? (2016, background): “…of Education and Human Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA Keywords Resource endowments Economic development Regional development Entrepreneur support organizations Business incubation University based business incubators Graduate firms JEL Classification L21 L25 L26 O33 O44”
- Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems (2020, background): “(Aernoudt, 2004), and many other initiatives partially draw on the same sup-”
- Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India (2020, unknown): “Incubators have been a vital element of STI policy (Aernoudt, 2004; Mian et al., 2016; Phan et al., 2005) in their role as intermediaries that link startups with networks of universities, investors, industry, government, etc.”