Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems

By Frank J. van Rijnsoever. Research Policy, 2020

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

To promote economic growth and overcome societal challenges, policy-makers often try to shape an entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) that will facilitate technological entrepreneurship. An EE consists of a knowledge subsystem and a business subsystem, which are often unconnected. A financial support network (FSN) consisting of startups and private venture capitalists can bridge two subsystems and thus enable critical technology transfer in EEs. These FSNs remain underdeveloped in many European regions, however; the literature on innovation systems refers to this lack of connectivity as a “weak network problem.” While incubators can function as intermediaries to overcome such weak network problems, how they do so is poorly understood. This research thus poses the following research question: What is the effect of incubators’ support mechanisms on the occurrence of weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems? We develop a theoretical model in which network development is a function of two processes: “meeting” and “mating.” We argue how different incubator support mechanisms influence these two processes; we then apply these insights in an agent-based model, which allows for estimating how much each support mechanism contributes to overcoming weak network problems in the FSN. Our simulation shows that developing a strong network among startups is key to overcoming weak network problems in FSNs. The most effective way to do so is to introduce incubated startups to non-incubated startups through field-building. Our results provide new theoretical insights into how networks in EEs and innovation systems develop, and what role incubators play as intermediaries in this process. The systemic benefits of incubators also greatly enhance their societal value proposition.

Subfields: Accounting, Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/840b42c5f9d1391bc296c091f4b305d7f9b33c6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates' career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? (2020, background): “…culture (role models, attitudes towards entrepreneurship) as well as relationships with government, investors, industry, and other socio-economic agents (Guerrero and Urbano, 2012; Herrera et al., 2018; Guerrero and Urbano, 2019a, 2019b; Nicholls-Nixon et al., 2020; van Rijnsoever, 2020).”
Perceived public support and entrepreneurship attitudes: A little reciprocity can go a long way! (2020, background): “For example, knowledge and consultancy delivered through business incubators can help individuals build financial skills and transform their ideas into commercial enterprises (Van Rijnsoever, 2020).”