Explaining incubators using firm analogy

By Lise Aaboen. 2009

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3577dad770c196162f9c00152811bff07627186

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment (2012, background): “…2008; Heydebreck et al., 2000), university faculty expertise (Lalkaka, 2003), advice on financing their technology development (Heydebreck et al., 2000; Macdonald and Joseph, 2001), and access to personal contacts (Aaboen, 2009; Abduh et al., 2007) are important services for incubator tenants.”
Entrepreneurial university ecosystems and graduates' career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? (2020, background): “…where graduates have access to unique resources, university capabilities, and networks that transform their academic entrepreneurs’ behaviours, risks, perceptions, and expectations (Aaboen, 2009; Barbero et al., 2014; Ebbers, 2014; McAdam and McAdam, 2008; Rothaermel and Thursby, 2005a, 2005b).”
Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective (2016, background): “As pointed out by Aaboen (2009), differences between incubators in terms of their objectives are in part dictated by the types of spin-outs they cater for.”
The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations (2012, background): “As a result, BIs ‘‘need to look good in the eyes of policy actors in order to gain increased income’’ (Aaboen, 2009, p. 667).”
The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal (2010, methodology): “Concerning the suitability of management, our findings confirm its crucial role in the success of a SP or BIs (Aernoudt, 2004; Grimaldi and Grandi, 2005; Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2002) but go further in discussing which practices enhance management effectiveness.”
Revisiting incubation performance (2012, unknown): “Objectives are very important to incubator literature [6,8,42] as such is the most widely used and sometimes the most important criteria [4] to distinguish between archetypal business incubators: Aernoudt [4] argues the criterion is best as it is closer to economic reality [4].”