Economic and strategic considerations surrounding Chinese FDI in the United States

By S. Globerman, Daniel M. Shapiro. 2009

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c50bd87d5e7b41eccfc02dce086cd29e73ac439a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Market–political ambidexterity during institutional transitions (2013, background): “This clearly suggests a necessity for such emerging multinationals to pay more attention to managing government and media relations in host countries—in addition to the obvious necessity to strengthen market capabilities (Globerman and Shapiro, 2009; Peng, 2012).”
The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. (2009, unknown): “As firms increasingly venture abroad, it is difficult to imagine firms that fail to do their “homework” by getting to know the various formal and informal rules of the game in overseas markets will emerge as winners ( Globerman & Shapiro, 2009; Hitt et al., 2004; Luo & Peng, 1999).”
Corporate governance and Asian companies (2011, methodology): “…Washington University) Rakesh Sambharya (Rutgers University) Steen Thomsen (Copenhagen Business School) William Wan (Texas Tech University) Dean Xu (CEIBS) Haibin Yang (City University of Hong Kong) Toru Yoshikawa (Singapore Management University) Xiaoxiang Zhang (Newcastle Business School)”
Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms (2017, background): “The natural association between state ownership and the Chinese government may increase political sensitiveness and public concern (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009; Zhang, Zhou, & Ebbers, 2011), which may lead to a negative impact on the market performance of SOE acquirers due to possible political…”
Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets (2013, background): “Another dimension of influence of governments for FDI from emerging economies is the negative role played by governments (Globerman and Shapiro, 2009; Morck et al., 2008; Witt and Lewin, 2007; Yamakawa et al., 2008).”
An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises (2015, background): “Moreover, this effect should be more salient in the period after governance reform because the market-oriented institutional environment is more conducive to the functioning of state ownership control (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009; Luo & Wang, 2012).”
The Role of Contextual Combinations in the Globalization of Chinese Firms (2014, unknown): “First, China as the home base of investing firms generates opposition on grounds of its lack of transparency and suspected state manipulation, which host-country opponents of the investment claim constitute violations of their country’s institutional norms (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009).”
Chinese foreign direct investment in R&D in Europe: A new model of R&D internationalization? (2012, background): “…the second (cross-border M&A) and the third (greenfield investment) international expansion patterns to tap into the resources and capabilities of advanced countries directly and effectively (Bonaglia et al., 2007; Deng, 2008; Globerman and Shapiro, 2009; Rui and Yip, 2008; Xie and White, 2006).”
The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Critical Review and Future Research (2012, background): “…most important motivations for Chinese firms to go abroad, which is designed to extend beyond setting up the most efficient affiliate in a single market and to fulfill strategic goals set at the corporate level for the purpose of maximum overall performance (Deng 2007; Globerman and Shapiro 2009).”
A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? (2018, background): “Some scholars (Child and Marinova 2014; Child and Rodrigues 2005; Deng 2004, 2007, 2009; Globerman and Shapiro 2009; Rui and Yip 2008) found that OFDI from Chinese firms involve technology and cross-border acquisitions to gain strategic capabilities.”
Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, unknown): “How they enter and adapt to the new and unfamiliar institutional environments abroad (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009; Hoskisson et al., 2013; Peng et al., 2011) as they deepen their international involvement will be a fascinating future direction.”
Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions (2010, background): “However, the level of regulative and normative barrier in a host country environment may vary (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009) for investing firms of different nationality.”
Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies (2014, background): “In fact, SOMNCs can be perceived as a threat to the hosts’ national security because of their links to their home government (Globerman and Shapiro, 2009).”
State ownership effect on firms' FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward-investing firms (2012, background): “Because of SOEs’ affiliation with the home institutions, when they invest overseas, they can be perceived by host-country institutions not simply as business entities, but also as political actors (Globerman & Shapiro, 2009; He & Lyles, 2008).”