The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students
By Julie M. Kittleson, Sherry A. Southerland. 2004
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4b4abd521dcd71cc5cbbb8f9c362c48a873f120
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Patricia Paugh
- Jang Syh-Jong
- V. Albe
- Kristen B. Wendell
- Ș. Purzer
- Christopher G. Wright
- Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren
- Carl-Johan Rundgren
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- A study of students' construction of science knowledge: talk and writing in a collaborative group (2007, background): “Co-construction refers to the process of jointly building an understanding, as would be characterized by collaborative learning experiences (see Kittleson & Southerland, 2004): Collaboration means an active give-and-take of ideas between persons rather than one person passively learning from the…”
- The Relationship Between Team Discourse, Self‐Efficacy, and Individual Achievement: A Sequential Mixed‐Methods Study (2011, background): “For example, Kittleson and Southerland (2004) conducted a qualitative study by closely observing two senior engineering capstone design teams.”
- Reflective Decision‐Making in Elementary Students' Engineering Design (2017, methodology): “This prior work sets an important foundation because design process expertise and science concept development are valuable learning outcomes for any aspiring or practicing engineer (Atman et al., 2007; Kittleson & Southerland, 2004).”
- When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience, Epistemological and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-scientific Issue (2008, background): “” Some authors have shown that students’ group discussions were focused on the procedural aspects of the activities (Bianchini 1997; Kittleson and Southerland 2004).”